Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Matthew Thaler v. Donald J. Trump for President, 18-1194 (2018)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 18-1194 Visitors: 32
Filed: Jul. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1194 MATTHEW K. THALER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC., Defendant - Appellee, and MARYLAND STATE POLICE, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:17-cv-01700-RDB) Submitted: June 28, 2018 Decided: July 13, 2018 Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1194 MATTHEW K. THALER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC., Defendant - Appellee, and MARYLAND STATE POLICE, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:17-cv-01700-RDB) Submitted: June 28, 2018 Decided: July 13, 2018 Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jason A. Ostendorf, LAW OFFICE OF JASON OSTENDORF LLC, Owings Mills, Maryland, for Appellant. Robert L. Ferguson, Jr., FERGUSON, SCHETELICH & BALLEW, PA, Baltimore, Maryland; David S. Torborg, Anthony J. Dick, JONES DAY, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Matthew K. Thaler appeals the district court’s order dismissing his claims of breach of contract, detrimental reliance, false imprisonment, false arrest, and battery for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thaler v. Donald J. Trump for President, Inc., No. 1:17-cv-01700-RDB (D. Md. Jan. 19, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer