Filed: Jun. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1223 LAZINA KING; RIA KING, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. CALIBER HOME LOANS INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. (8:16-cv-03489-GJH) Submitted: June 14, 2018 Decided: June 18, 2018 Before TRAXLER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lazina King, Ria King, Appellants Pr
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1223 LAZINA KING; RIA KING, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. CALIBER HOME LOANS INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. (8:16-cv-03489-GJH) Submitted: June 14, 2018 Decided: June 18, 2018 Before TRAXLER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lazina King, Ria King, Appellants Pro..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1223 LAZINA KING; RIA KING, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. CALIBER HOME LOANS INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. (8:16-cv-03489-GJH) Submitted: June 14, 2018 Decided: June 18, 2018 Before TRAXLER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lazina King, Ria King, Appellants Pro Se. Melissa O. Martinez, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Lazina King and Ria King appeal the district court’s orders dismissing their complaint as barred by res judicata and denying their Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. King v. Caliber Home Loans Inc., No. 8:16-cv- 03489-GJH (D. Md. Sept. 22, 2017; Feb. 23, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
