Filed: Aug. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1433 REDMOND HOWARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SUE TOLLIVER, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (6:18-cv-00006-NKM) Submitted: August 16, 2018 Decided: August 20, 2018 Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Redmond Howard, Appel
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1433 REDMOND HOWARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SUE TOLLIVER, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (6:18-cv-00006-NKM) Submitted: August 16, 2018 Decided: August 20, 2018 Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Redmond Howard, Appell..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1433
REDMOND HOWARD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SUE TOLLIVER,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (6:18-cv-00006-NKM)
Submitted: August 16, 2018 Decided: August 20, 2018
Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Redmond Howard, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Granger Klockenbrink, Monica Taylor
Monday, GENTRY LOCKE, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Redmond Howard appeals the district court’s order dismissing with prejudice,
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), (6), the underlying civil action in which Howard
asserted disability discrimination claims and a civil rights claim pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Howard v. Tolliver, No. 6:18-
cv-00006-NKM (W.D. Va. Apr. 16, 2018). We deny Howard’s motions to amend the
notice of appeal to add another party to the action. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2