Filed: Oct. 10, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1452 JOE LEWIS THOMAS; SARAH A. THOMAS, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. ENTERPRISE BANK OF SOUTH CAROLINA; RICHARD CREECH, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (1:16-cv-02793-JMC) Submitted: September 27, 2018 Decided: October 10, 2018 Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1452 JOE LEWIS THOMAS; SARAH A. THOMAS, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. ENTERPRISE BANK OF SOUTH CAROLINA; RICHARD CREECH, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (1:16-cv-02793-JMC) Submitted: September 27, 2018 Decided: October 10, 2018 Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1452
JOE LEWIS THOMAS; SARAH A. THOMAS,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
ENTERPRISE BANK OF SOUTH CAROLINA; RICHARD CREECH,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken.
J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (1:16-cv-02793-JMC)
Submitted: September 27, 2018 Decided: October 10, 2018
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joe Lewis Thomas, Sarah A. Thomas, Appellants Pro Se. Norma Anne Turner Jett,
NESS & JETT, LLC, Bamberg, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Plaintiffs Joe Lewis Thomas and Sarah A. Thomas appeal the district court’s order
dismissing their claim seeking relief under the Home Affordable Modification Program,
12 U.S.C. §§ 5219, 5219a (2012), and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction
over their state-law claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thomas v. Enter.
Bank of S.C., No. 1:16-cv-02793-JMC (D.S.C. Mar. 23, 2018). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2