Filed: Jun. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1456 DEUTSCH BANK NATIONAL COMPANY, as Trustee for INDYMAC INDX Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-AR12, Mortgage Pass Through Certificates Series 2006-AR12, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MARGARET FEGELY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:16-cv-00147-MHL) Submitted: June 14, 2018 Decided: June 18, 2018 Before TRAXLER, D
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1456 DEUTSCH BANK NATIONAL COMPANY, as Trustee for INDYMAC INDX Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-AR12, Mortgage Pass Through Certificates Series 2006-AR12, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MARGARET FEGELY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:16-cv-00147-MHL) Submitted: June 14, 2018 Decided: June 18, 2018 Before TRAXLER, DU..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1456
DEUTSCH BANK NATIONAL COMPANY, as Trustee for INDYMAC INDX
Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-AR12, Mortgage Pass Through Certificates Series
2006-AR12,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MARGARET FEGELY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:16-cv-00147-MHL)
Submitted: June 14, 2018 Decided: June 18, 2018
Before TRAXLER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Margaret Fegely, Appellant Pro Se. Abby Kelley Moynihan, MCCABE WEISBERG &
CONWAY, LLC, Laurel, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Margaret Fegely seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying her Fed. R. Civ.
P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337
U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Fegely seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack
of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2