Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Cedrick Draper v. Victor Skaff, 18-1552 (2018)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 18-1552 Visitors: 21
Filed: Sep. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1552 CEDRICK EURON DRAPER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. VICTOR S. SKAFF, III, a/k/a Dinny, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, Chief District Judge. (7:18-cv-00159-MFU) No. 18-1553 CEDRICK EURON DRAPER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PINKERTON CHEVROLET - LYNCHBURG, INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1552 CEDRICK EURON DRAPER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. VICTOR S. SKAFF, III, a/k/a Dinny, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, Chief District Judge. (7:18-cv-00159-MFU) No. 18-1553 CEDRICK EURON DRAPER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PINKERTON CHEVROLET - LYNCHBURG, INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (6:18-cv-00049-NKM) Submitted: September 17, 2018 Decided: September 28, 2018 Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Cedrick Euron Draper, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: In No. 18-1552, Cedric Euron Draper appeals the dismissal of his action alleging breach of contract for want of subject matter jurisdiction. In No. 18-1553, he appeals the dismissal of his action alleging age and sex discrimination as frivolous and for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district courts. Draper v. Skaff, No. 7:18-cv-00159-MFU (W.D. Va. Apr. 17, 2018); Draper v. Pinkerton Chevrolet, No. 6:18-cv-00049-NKM (W.D. Va. Apr. 12, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer