Filed: Aug. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1555 LOUIS BONANNO, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. US ATTORNEY GENERAL; ELIZABETH B. PEAY, Assistant Attorney General; VIRGINIA EMPLOYMENT COMMISSION; N. TURNER, Appointed Staff, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-00978-CMH-JFA) Submitted: August 16, 2018 Decided: August 20, 2018 Before WY
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1555 LOUIS BONANNO, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. US ATTORNEY GENERAL; ELIZABETH B. PEAY, Assistant Attorney General; VIRGINIA EMPLOYMENT COMMISSION; N. TURNER, Appointed Staff, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-00978-CMH-JFA) Submitted: August 16, 2018 Decided: August 20, 2018 Before WYN..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1555 LOUIS BONANNO, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. US ATTORNEY GENERAL; ELIZABETH B. PEAY, Assistant Attorney General; VIRGINIA EMPLOYMENT COMMISSION; N. TURNER, Appointed Staff, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-00978-CMH-JFA) Submitted: August 16, 2018 Decided: August 20, 2018 Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Louis Bonanno, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Joshua Edward Laws, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Louis Bonanno, Sr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing Bonanno’s amended civil complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bonanno v. U.S. Attorney Gen., No. 1:17-cv-00978-CMH-JFA (E.D. Va. Apr. 24, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2