Filed: Oct. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1667 CEDRICK EURON DRAPER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NEW RIVER VALLEY PIZZA LLC, d/b/a Domino's Pizza, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Robert Stewart Ballou, Magistrate Judge. (7:18-cv-00111-RSB) Submitted: October 5, 2018 Decided: October 24, 2018 Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublish
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1667 CEDRICK EURON DRAPER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NEW RIVER VALLEY PIZZA LLC, d/b/a Domino's Pizza, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Robert Stewart Ballou, Magistrate Judge. (7:18-cv-00111-RSB) Submitted: October 5, 2018 Decided: October 24, 2018 Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublishe..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1667
CEDRICK EURON DRAPER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NEW RIVER VALLEY PIZZA LLC, d/b/a Domino's Pizza,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. Robert Stewart Ballou, Magistrate Judge. (7:18-cv-00111-RSB)
Submitted: October 5, 2018 Decided: October 24, 2018
Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cedrick Euron Draper, Appellant Pro Se. Terry Gene Kilgore, KILGORE LAW OFFICE,
Gate City, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Cedrick Euron Draper appeals the district court’s order dismissing this civil action
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). On appeal, we confine our review to the
issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Draper’s informal
brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Draper has forfeited
appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey,
775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th
Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our
review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2