Filed: Nov. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1686 In re: LUIS ALBERIO MISAS RUEDA, a/k/a Carlos E. Sanchez, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Submitted: November 15, 2018 Decided: November 19, 2018 Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Luis Alberio Misas Rueda, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Luis Alber
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1686 In re: LUIS ALBERIO MISAS RUEDA, a/k/a Carlos E. Sanchez, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Submitted: November 15, 2018 Decided: November 19, 2018 Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Luis Alberio Misas Rueda, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Luis Alberi..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1686
In re: LUIS ALBERIO MISAS RUEDA, a/k/a Carlos E. Sanchez,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
Submitted: November 15, 2018 Decided: November 19, 2018
Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Luis Alberio Misas Rueda, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Luis Alberio Misas Rueda petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order from
this court directing the Department of Homeland Security to schedule and hold a removal
hearing in his immigration proceedings. We lack jurisdiction to consider Rueda’s
petition. Under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(g) (2012), “no court shall have jurisdiction to hear any
cause or claim by or on behalf of any alien arising from the decision or action by the
Attorney General to commence proceedings, adjudicate cases, or execute removal orders
against any alien under this chapter.” We therefore dismiss the petition for writ of
mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DISMISSED
2