Filed: Oct. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1720 CEDRICK EURON DRAPER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM, LLC, d/b/a Avis Rent A Car, LLC (Campbell County Virginia), Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:18-cv-00188-HEH) Submitted: October 16, 2018 Decided: October 24, 2018 Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior C
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1720 CEDRICK EURON DRAPER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM, LLC, d/b/a Avis Rent A Car, LLC (Campbell County Virginia), Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:18-cv-00188-HEH) Submitted: October 16, 2018 Decided: October 24, 2018 Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Ci..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1720
CEDRICK EURON DRAPER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM, LLC, d/b/a Avis Rent A Car, LLC (Campbell
County Virginia),
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:18-cv-00188-HEH)
Submitted: October 16, 2018 Decided: October 24, 2018
Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cedrick Euron Draper, Appellant Pro Se. Justin Michael Sizemore, REED SMITH, LLP,
Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Cedrick Euron Draper appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action
claiming fraud and breach of contract for failure to state a claim. On appeal, we confine
our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because
Draper’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition,
Draper has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey,
775
F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under
Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2