Filed: Nov. 01, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1784 In re: GARRY DAVID GALLARDO, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:17-cv-00106-FPS-JPM) Submitted: October 19, 2018 Decided: November 1, 2018 Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Garry David Gallardo, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Garry David Gallardo peti
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1784 In re: GARRY DAVID GALLARDO, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:17-cv-00106-FPS-JPM) Submitted: October 19, 2018 Decided: November 1, 2018 Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Garry David Gallardo, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Garry David Gallardo petit..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1784
In re: GARRY DAVID GALLARDO,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:17-cv-00106-FPS-JPM)
Submitted: October 19, 2018 Decided: November 1, 2018
Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Garry David Gallardo, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Garry David Gallardo petitions for a writ of mandamus, asking this court to
compel the district court “to either award the writ of habeas corpus or issue an order to
the respondent to show cause why the writ of habeas corpus should not be granted.”
Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary
circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court,
426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v.
Moussaoui,
333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). The party seeking issuance of the writ
of mandamus bears the burden of showing that his right to the writ is clear and
indisputable.
Moussaoui, 333 F.3d at 517 (citations omitted). We conclude that Gallardo
fails to make this showing. Accordingly, although we grant him leave to proceed in
forma pauperis, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2