Filed: Dec. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1851 TIMOTHY E. TWEED, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General, Department of Justice, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:17-cv-01417-LMB-JFA) Submitted: December 18, 2018 Decided: December 20, 2018 Before AGEE, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1851 TIMOTHY E. TWEED, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General, Department of Justice, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:17-cv-01417-LMB-JFA) Submitted: December 18, 2018 Decided: December 20, 2018 Before AGEE, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1851
TIMOTHY E. TWEED,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General, Department of Justice,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:17-cv-01417-LMB-JFA)
Submitted: December 18, 2018 Decided: December 20, 2018
Before AGEE, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy Everette Tweed, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Timothy Everette Tweed appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action
raising claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A.
§§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2017), the Religious Freedom Restoration
Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000bb to 2000bb-4 (2012), and state law. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Tweed v. Whitaker, No. 1:17-cv-01417-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. July 18,
2018). We deny the motions for sanctions and for judicial notice and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2