Filed: Dec. 21, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1980 JESSE GRAVES YATES, III, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BB&T CORP., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. A. Marvin Quattlebaum, Jr., District Judge. (4:17-cv-01387-AMQ) Submitted: December 18, 2018 Decided: December 21, 2018 Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jesse
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1980 JESSE GRAVES YATES, III, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BB&T CORP., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. A. Marvin Quattlebaum, Jr., District Judge. (4:17-cv-01387-AMQ) Submitted: December 18, 2018 Decided: December 21, 2018 Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jesse ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1980 JESSE GRAVES YATES, III, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BB&T CORP., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. A. Marvin Quattlebaum, Jr., District Judge. (4:17-cv-01387-AMQ) Submitted: December 18, 2018 Decided: December 21, 2018 Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jesse G. Yates, III, Appellant Pro Se. John C. Hawk, III, WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON (US) LLP, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jesse Graves Yates, III, appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing his civil complaint for failure to state a claim, Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Yates v. BB&T Corp., No. 4:17-cv-01387-AMQ (D.S.C. July 23, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
