Filed: Nov. 21, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6000 ANTHONY Q. KELLY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Mr. STEPHEN T. MOYER, Secretary of Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services; STATE OF MARYLAND; FRANK B. BISHOP, JR., Warden; RICHARD S. RODERICK, Case Management Manager, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:16-cv-04143-RDB) Submitted: Nove
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6000 ANTHONY Q. KELLY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Mr. STEPHEN T. MOYER, Secretary of Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services; STATE OF MARYLAND; FRANK B. BISHOP, JR., Warden; RICHARD S. RODERICK, Case Management Manager, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:16-cv-04143-RDB) Submitted: Novem..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6000
ANTHONY Q. KELLY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
Mr. STEPHEN T. MOYER, Secretary of Maryland Department of Public Safety
and Correctional Services; STATE OF MARYLAND; FRANK B. BISHOP, JR.,
Warden; RICHARD S. RODERICK, Case Management Manager,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:16-cv-04143-RDB)
Submitted: November 13, 2018 Decided: November 21, 2018
Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Quentin Kelly, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Quentin Kelly appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Kelly v. Moyer, No. 1:16-cv-04143-RDB (D. Md. Aug. 14 & Nov. 9,
2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2