Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Darrell Brown v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 18-6028 (2018)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 18-6028 Visitors: 6
Filed: Apr. 03, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6028 DARRELL WAYNE BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:17-cv-00071-REP-RCY) Submitted: March 29, 2018 Decided: April 3, 2018 Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
More
                                    UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT


                                      No. 18-6028


DARRELL WAYNE BROWN,

                    Plaintiff - Appellant,

             v.

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

                    Defendant - Appellee.



Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:17-cv-00071-REP-RCY)


Submitted: March 29, 2018                                         Decided: April 3, 2018


Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.


Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


Darrell Wayne Brown, Appellant Pro Se.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

      Darrell Wayne Brown appeals the district court’s order dismissing under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(b)(1) (2012) his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents

of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 
403 U.S. 388
(1971). We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Brown v. Virginia, No. 3:17-cv-00071-REP-RCY (E.D. Va. Dec. 14, 2017). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                             AFFIRMED




                                            2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer