Filed: Apr. 03, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6065 MUSTAFA MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. IFWE, INC., a/k/a Tagged.com, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:17-cv-02767-TDC) Submitted: March 29, 2018 Decided: April 3, 2018 Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mustafa Muhamm
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6065 MUSTAFA MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. IFWE, INC., a/k/a Tagged.com, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:17-cv-02767-TDC) Submitted: March 29, 2018 Decided: April 3, 2018 Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mustafa Muhamma..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6065
MUSTAFA MUHAMMAD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
IFWE, INC., a/k/a Tagged.com,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:17-cv-02767-TDC)
Submitted: March 29, 2018 Decided: April 3, 2018
Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mustafa Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mustafa Muhammad appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil
complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Muhammad v. IFWE, Inc., No. 8:17-cv-02767-TDC (D. Md. Jan. 4, 2018). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2