Filed: Nov. 08, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6213 KELVIN A. CANADA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LIEUTENANT ROUNTREE; WILLIAM C. LANE, Lieutenant; CAPTAIN WHITEHEAD; J. MAYO, Officer; OFFICER GOODRICH; OFFICER BAINES; OFFICER ASKEW; OFFICER ADAMS; M. WOODRUFF, Nurse; L. O’NEAL, Nurse, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:13-cv-00013-HCM-DEM)
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6213 KELVIN A. CANADA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LIEUTENANT ROUNTREE; WILLIAM C. LANE, Lieutenant; CAPTAIN WHITEHEAD; J. MAYO, Officer; OFFICER GOODRICH; OFFICER BAINES; OFFICER ASKEW; OFFICER ADAMS; M. WOODRUFF, Nurse; L. O’NEAL, Nurse, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:13-cv-00013-HCM-DEM) ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6213
KELVIN A. CANADA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LIEUTENANT ROUNTREE; WILLIAM C. LANE, Lieutenant; CAPTAIN
WHITEHEAD; J. MAYO, Officer; OFFICER GOODRICH; OFFICER BAINES;
OFFICER ASKEW; OFFICER ADAMS; M. WOODRUFF, Nurse; L. O’NEAL,
Nurse,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:13-cv-00013-HCM-DEM)
Submitted: September 28, 2018 Decided: November 8, 2018
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kelvin A. Canada, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kelvin A. Canada appeals the district court’s judgment following a bench trial
finding in favor of defendants and denying relief on Canada’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and Canada’s claims and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Canada v. Lt.
Rountree, No. 2:13-cv-00013-HCM-DEM (E.D. Va. Feb. 16, 2018). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2