Filed: Jun. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6272 SUPREME RAHEEM ACKBAR, a/k/a Ronald Gary, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WILLIAM R. BYERS, JR., Commissioner of the South Carolina Department of Corrections; WARDEN JOSEPH MCFADDEN; LIEUTENANT EUGENE SKIPPER; LIEUTENANT COOPER; SERGEANT WILSON, Defendants - Appellees, and LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; SCDC; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolin
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6272 SUPREME RAHEEM ACKBAR, a/k/a Ronald Gary, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WILLIAM R. BYERS, JR., Commissioner of the South Carolina Department of Corrections; WARDEN JOSEPH MCFADDEN; LIEUTENANT EUGENE SKIPPER; LIEUTENANT COOPER; SERGEANT WILSON, Defendants - Appellees, and LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; SCDC; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6272
SUPREME RAHEEM ACKBAR, a/k/a Ronald Gary,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM R. BYERS, JR., Commissioner of the South Carolina Department of
Corrections; WARDEN JOSEPH MCFADDEN; LIEUTENANT EUGENE
SKIPPER; LIEUTENANT COOPER; SERGEANT WILSON,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; SCDC; STATE OF SOUTH
CAROLINA,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Florence. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (4:17-cv-01019-RMG)
Submitted: June 20, 2018 Decided: June 27, 2018
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Supreme Raheem Ackbar, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael DeAntonio, Christopher
Thomas Dorsel, SENN LEGAL, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Supreme Raheem Ackbar appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting defendants’ motion to dismiss his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ackbar v.
Byers, No. 4:17-cv-01019-RMG (D.S.C. Mar. 6, 2018). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3