Filed: Aug. 31, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6335 JAMAR A. CANNON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EDWARD HULL; PHYLLIS BACK, Major; DARRYL TURNER, Captain of Security; CAPTAIN HICKEY; D. LUBEKE; OFFICER STEPHAN; SERGEANT S. BERRY; MICHELLE LEWIS, Director of Inmate Services, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00359-LMB-TCB) Submitted: August 2
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6335 JAMAR A. CANNON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EDWARD HULL; PHYLLIS BACK, Major; DARRYL TURNER, Captain of Security; CAPTAIN HICKEY; D. LUBEKE; OFFICER STEPHAN; SERGEANT S. BERRY; MICHELLE LEWIS, Director of Inmate Services, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00359-LMB-TCB) Submitted: August 28..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6335
JAMAR A. CANNON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
EDWARD HULL; PHYLLIS BACK, Major; DARRYL TURNER, Captain of
Security; CAPTAIN HICKEY; D. LUBEKE; OFFICER STEPHAN;
SERGEANT S. BERRY; MICHELLE LEWIS, Director of Inmate Services,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00359-LMB-TCB)
Submitted: August 28, 2018 Decided: August 31, 2018
Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jamar A. Cannon, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC,
Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jamar A. Cannon appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cannon v. Hull, No.
1:16-cv-00359-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. Feb. 12, 2018). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2