Filed: Oct. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6395 JOHN THOMAS LEWIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MICHAEL WADE, Sheriff, Henrico County Sheriff’s Department; LIEUTENANT ROBINSON, Lieutenant, Henrico County Sheriff’s Department; DEPUTY AMOAH, Deputy, Henrico County Sheriff’s Department, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-00835-CMH-TCB) S
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6395 JOHN THOMAS LEWIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MICHAEL WADE, Sheriff, Henrico County Sheriff’s Department; LIEUTENANT ROBINSON, Lieutenant, Henrico County Sheriff’s Department; DEPUTY AMOAH, Deputy, Henrico County Sheriff’s Department, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-00835-CMH-TCB) Su..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6395
JOHN THOMAS LEWIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL WADE, Sheriff, Henrico County Sheriff’s Department;
LIEUTENANT ROBINSON, Lieutenant, Henrico County Sheriff’s Department;
DEPUTY AMOAH, Deputy, Henrico County Sheriff’s Department,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-00835-CMH-TCB)
Submitted: September 28, 2018 Decided: October 12, 2018
Before WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Thomas Lewis, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
John Thomas Lewis appeals the district court’s order granting defendants’ motion
for summary judgment and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Lewis v. Wade, No. 1:16-cv-00835-CMH-TCB (E.D.
Va. Mar. 20, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2