Filed: Nov. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6714 EARNEST E. VAUGHN, SR., a/k/a Earnest E. Vaughn, a/k/a Earnest Edward Vaughn, Sr., a/k/a Earnest Edward Vaughn, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LARRY ROBERT BYRD, a/k/a Robbie Byrd; GREENWOOD COUNTY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District Judge. (8:17-cv-02232-TLW) Submitted: November 15, 2018 Decided: November 28,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6714 EARNEST E. VAUGHN, SR., a/k/a Earnest E. Vaughn, a/k/a Earnest Edward Vaughn, Sr., a/k/a Earnest Edward Vaughn, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LARRY ROBERT BYRD, a/k/a Robbie Byrd; GREENWOOD COUNTY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District Judge. (8:17-cv-02232-TLW) Submitted: November 15, 2018 Decided: November 28, 2..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6714
EARNEST E. VAUGHN, SR., a/k/a Earnest E. Vaughn, a/k/a Earnest Edward
Vaughn, Sr., a/k/a Earnest Edward Vaughn,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LARRY ROBERT BYRD, a/k/a Robbie Byrd; GREENWOOD COUNTY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Anderson. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District Judge. (8:17-cv-02232-TLW)
Submitted: November 15, 2018 Decided: November 28, 2018
Before KING, THACKER, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Earnest Edward Vaughn, Appellant Pro Se. Russell W. Harter, Jr., CHAPMAN,
HARTER & HARTER, PA, Greenville, South Carolina; F. Lee Prickett, III, HOLDER
PADGETT LITTLEJOHN & PRICKETT, LLC, Greenville, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Earnest Edward Vaughn appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Vaughn v. Byrd, No.
8:17-cv-02232-TLW (D.S.C. June 5, 2018). We deny Vaughn’s motion for appointment
of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2