Filed: Dec. 03, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6839 JAMES ELLIOTT PRICE, Petitioner - Appellant, v. MICHAEL D. ANDREWS, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:18-cv-00360-CCE-JLW) Submitted: November 28, 2018 Decided: December 3, 2018 Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curi
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6839 JAMES ELLIOTT PRICE, Petitioner - Appellant, v. MICHAEL D. ANDREWS, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:18-cv-00360-CCE-JLW) Submitted: November 28, 2018 Decided: December 3, 2018 Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curia..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6839
JAMES ELLIOTT PRICE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL D. ANDREWS,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:18-cv-00360-CCE-JLW)
Submitted: November 28, 2018 Decided: December 3, 2018
Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Elliott Price, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James Elliott Price, a former North Carolina pretrial detainee, appeals the district
court’s ordering accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing
without prejudice Price’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition, in which he challenged his
pretrial detention and bond. At the time Price noted his appeal, he was awaiting trial in
North Carolina state court. Price was convicted and released from custody during the
pendency of this appeal. Because Price is no longer in custody, we dismiss this appeal as
moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2