Filed: Feb. 28, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2054 JODIE LOVE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. VIRGINIA PORT AUTHORITY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:16-cv-00160-AWA-RJK) Submitted: February 26, 2019 Decided: February 28, 2019 Before KING, THACKER, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jodie Love, Appellant P
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2054 JODIE LOVE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. VIRGINIA PORT AUTHORITY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:16-cv-00160-AWA-RJK) Submitted: February 26, 2019 Decided: February 28, 2019 Before KING, THACKER, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jodie Love, Appellant Pr..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-2054
JODIE LOVE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
VIRGINIA PORT AUTHORITY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:16-cv-00160-AWA-RJK)
Submitted: February 26, 2019 Decided: February 28, 2019
Before KING, THACKER, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jodie Love, Appellant Pro Se. Jimmy F. Robinson, Jr., James Clay Rollins, OGLETREE
DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jodie Love appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the
Virginia Port Authority on Love’s interference and retaliation claims under the Family
and Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2654 (2012). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Love v. Va. Port Auth., No. 2:16-cv-00160-AWA-RLJ (E.D. Va., Aug. 10, 2018).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2