Filed: May 07, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2067 CELESTIN MONGA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ABS MOVING & STORAGE, INC.; NATALIE SMITH; AVI SABBAN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:16-cv-02000-PWG) Submitted: April 12, 2019 Decided: May 7, 2019 Before AGEE and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curia
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2067 CELESTIN MONGA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ABS MOVING & STORAGE, INC.; NATALIE SMITH; AVI SABBAN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:16-cv-02000-PWG) Submitted: April 12, 2019 Decided: May 7, 2019 Before AGEE and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-2067
CELESTIN MONGA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ABS MOVING & STORAGE, INC.; NATALIE SMITH; AVI SABBAN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:16-cv-02000-PWG)
Submitted: April 12, 2019 Decided: May 7, 2019
Before AGEE and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frederic D. Abramson, LAW OFFICES OF FREDERIC D. ABRAMSON, Gaithersburg,
Maryland, for Appellant. Tamara B. Goorevitz, FRANKLIN & PROKOPIK, P.C.,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Celestin Monga seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying Monga’s motion
for reconsideration of the denial of his motion for remand. This court may exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and
collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial
Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Monga seeks to appeal is
neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2