Filed: Feb. 28, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2367 In re: DILLON MVURI, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:18-cv-00797-LMB-JFA) Submitted: February 26, 2019 Decided: February 28, 2019 Before KING, THACKER, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dillon Mvuri, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Dillon Mvuri petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an or
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2367 In re: DILLON MVURI, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:18-cv-00797-LMB-JFA) Submitted: February 26, 2019 Decided: February 28, 2019 Before KING, THACKER, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dillon Mvuri, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Dillon Mvuri petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an ord..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-2367
In re: DILLON MVURI,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(1:18-cv-00797-LMB-JFA)
Submitted: February 26, 2019 Decided: February 28, 2019
Before KING, THACKER, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dillon Mvuri, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Dillon Mvuri petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the
district court to vacate its orders denying his motions to compel discovery and to amend
the complaint in his civil action. We conclude that Mvuri is not entitled to mandamus
relief.
Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary
circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court,
426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v.
Moussaoui,
333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is available
only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. &
Loan Ass’n,
860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Mandamus may not be used as a
substitute for appeal. In re Lockheed Martin Corp.,
503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007).
The relief sought by Mvuri is not available by way of mandamus. Mvuri recently
filed an appeal from the final order in the civil action, see Mvuri v. Am. Airlines, Inc. (4th
Cir.) (No. 19-1084), and he may, if he chooses, challenge the orders denying his motions
to compel and to amend his complaint in that appeal. Accordingly, although we grant
leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED
2