Filed: Jul. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2372 MARVA CAMPBELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ROPER ST. FRANCIS HEALTHCARE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:16-cv-02559-DCN) Submitted: May 29, 2019 Decided: July 18, 2019 Before KEENAN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marva Campb
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2372 MARVA CAMPBELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ROPER ST. FRANCIS HEALTHCARE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:16-cv-02559-DCN) Submitted: May 29, 2019 Decided: July 18, 2019 Before KEENAN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marva Campbe..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2372 MARVA CAMPBELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ROPER ST. FRANCIS HEALTHCARE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:16-cv-02559-DCN) Submitted: May 29, 2019 Decided: July 18, 2019 Before KEENAN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marva Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Marva Campbell appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to her former employer on her employment discrimination claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Campbell’s motion for the preparation of transcripts at government expense * and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Campbell v. Roper St. Francis Healthcare, No. 2:16-cv-02559-DCN (D.S.C. Nov. 5, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * There are no transcripts to prepare because the district court did not hold any hearings. 2