Filed: Apr. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2400 THOMAS JEROME NEAL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GREEN FORD, LLC, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. (1:17-cv-00569-TDS-LPA) Submitted: April 4, 2019 Decided: April 8, 2019 Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2400 THOMAS JEROME NEAL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GREEN FORD, LLC, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. (1:17-cv-00569-TDS-LPA) Submitted: April 4, 2019 Decided: April 8, 2019 Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion...
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2400 THOMAS JEROME NEAL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GREEN FORD, LLC, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. (1:17-cv-00569-TDS-LPA) Submitted: April 4, 2019 Decided: April 8, 2019 Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas Jerome Neal, Appellant Pro Se. Rachel Scott Decker, Kenneth Ralph Keller, CARRUTHERS & ROTH, PA, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Thomas Jerome Neal appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to his former employer. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Neal v. Green Ford, LLC, No. 1:17-cv-00569-TDS-LPA (M.D.N.C. Nov. 15, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
