Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Michael Star v. Michael Chapman, 18-2439 (2019)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 18-2439 Visitors: 1
Filed: Apr. 16, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2439 MICHAEL STAR, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MICHAEL CHAPMAN, Sheriff of Loudoun County, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:18-cv-01047-LO-IDD) Submitted: March 27, 2019 Decided: April 16, 2019 Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam op
More
                                    UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT


                                      No. 18-2439


MICHAEL STAR,

                    Plaintiff - Appellant,

             v.

MICHAEL CHAPMAN, Sheriff of Loudoun County,

                    Defendant - Appellee.



Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:18-cv-01047-LO-IDD)


Submitted: March 27, 2019                                         Decided: April 16, 2019


Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.


Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


Michael Star, Appellant Pro Se.  Alexander Francuzenko, COOK CRAIG &
FRANCUZENKO, PLLC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

      Michael Star appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Star v. Chapman, No.

1:18-cv-01047-LO-IDD (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 29, 2018 & entered Oct. 30, 2018). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                                            AFFIRMED




                                           2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer