Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Phillip O'Briant v. Larry Hogan, 18-2443 (2019)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 18-2443 Visitors: 3
Filed: Mar. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2443 PHILLIP O’BRIANT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LARRY HOGAN, Governor; PETE K. RAHN, Secretary, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:18-cv-03270-RDB) Submitted: March 5, 2019 Decided: March 13, 2019 Before MOTZ, AGEE, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Phillip O’Briant
More
                                      UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT


                                       No. 18-2443


PHILLIP O’BRIANT,

                    Plaintiff - Appellant,

             v.

LARRY HOGAN, Governor; PETE K. RAHN, Secretary,

                    Defendants - Appellees.



Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:18-cv-03270-RDB)


Submitted: March 5, 2019                                          Decided: March 13, 2019


Before MOTZ, AGEE, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


Phillip O’Briant, Appellant Pro Se.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

       Phillip O’Briant appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint under

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See O’Briant v.

Hogan, No. 1:18-cv-03270-RDB (D. Md. Nov. 14, 2018).              We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                              AFFIRMED




                                            2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer