Filed: Jan. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-4737 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MOHAMED E. SCROUR, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:18-cr-00271-LMB-1) Submitted: January 22, 2019 Decided: January 25, 2019 Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mohamed E. Scrour, Appellan
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-4737 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MOHAMED E. SCROUR, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:18-cr-00271-LMB-1) Submitted: January 22, 2019 Decided: January 25, 2019 Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mohamed E. Scrour, Appellant..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-4737 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MOHAMED E. SCROUR, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:18-cr-00271-LMB-1) Submitted: January 22, 2019 Decided: January 25, 2019 Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mohamed E. Scrour, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Mohamed E. Scrour appeals the district court’s orders affirming the magistrate judge’s criminal judgment and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Scrour, No. 1:18-cr-00271-LMB-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 10, 2018 & Sept. 24, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
