Filed: Jun. 24, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1119 DERRICK LAMONT ENGLISH, Debtor - Appellant, v. TIMOTHY P. BRANIGAN, Trustee - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:18-cv-03549-TDC) Submitted: June 20, 2019 Decided: June 24, 2019 Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Derrick Lamont English, Appellant Pro Se.
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1119 DERRICK LAMONT ENGLISH, Debtor - Appellant, v. TIMOTHY P. BRANIGAN, Trustee - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:18-cv-03549-TDC) Submitted: June 20, 2019 Decided: June 24, 2019 Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Derrick Lamont English, Appellant Pro Se. U..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1119 DERRICK LAMONT ENGLISH, Debtor - Appellant, v. TIMOTHY P. BRANIGAN, Trustee - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:18-cv-03549-TDC) Submitted: June 20, 2019 Decided: June 24, 2019 Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Derrick Lamont English, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Derrick Lamont English appeals the district court’s order dismissing his appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing his Chapter 13 bankruptcy proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. English v. Branigan, No. 8:18-cv-03549-TDC (D. Md. Jan. 15, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
