Filed: Jul. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1125 LITTLE TOM CHILDRESS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. REBECCA ROBERTS, Site Manager; BOYD MANAGEMENT LTD, Defendants - Appellees, and BABBIE M. JACO, Vice President, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (7:17-cv-02529-HMH-JDA) Submitted: June 18, 2019 Decided: July 8, 2019 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1125 LITTLE TOM CHILDRESS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. REBECCA ROBERTS, Site Manager; BOYD MANAGEMENT LTD, Defendants - Appellees, and BABBIE M. JACO, Vice President, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (7:17-cv-02529-HMH-JDA) Submitted: June 18, 2019 Decided: July 8, 2019 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1125
LITTLE TOM CHILDRESS, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
REBECCA ROBERTS, Site Manager; BOYD MANAGEMENT LTD,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
BABBIE M. JACO, Vice President,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (7:17-cv-02529-HMH-JDA)
Submitted: June 18, 2019 Decided: July 8, 2019
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Little Tom Childress, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Hawthorne Barrett, TURNER,
PADGET, GRAHAM & LANEY, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Little Tom Childress, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting partial
summary judgment to Defendants. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337
U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Childress seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor
an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for
lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2