Filed: Sep. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1163 In re: ALLEN RAY DYER, Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:18-mc-00237) Submitted: August 13, 2019 Decided: September 5, 2019 Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Allen Ray Dyer, LAW OFFICE OF ALLEN DYER, Ellicott City, Maryland, for
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1163 In re: ALLEN RAY DYER, Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:18-mc-00237) Submitted: August 13, 2019 Decided: September 5, 2019 Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Allen Ray Dyer, LAW OFFICE OF ALLEN DYER, Ellicott City, Maryland, for A..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1163
In re: ALLEN RAY DYER,
Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:18-mc-00237)
Submitted: August 13, 2019 Decided: September 5, 2019
Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Allen Ray Dyer, LAW OFFICE OF ALLEN DYER, Ellicott City, Maryland, for Appellant.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Allen Ray Dyer appeals the district court’s order entering a public reprimand after
Dyer was disciplined by the Court of Appeals of Maryland. We have reviewed the record
and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing reciprocal
discipline. See In re Morrissey,
305 F.3d 211, 217 (4th Cir. 2002); In re Fallin,
255 F.3d
195, 197 (4th Cir. 2001). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. In re Dyer, No. 1:18-mc-00237 (D. Md. Jan. 19, 2019). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2