Filed: Jun. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1173 FURQAN MOHAMMAD, Debtor - Appellant, v. U.S. BANK, N.A., Creditor - Appellee, and JOHN P. FITZGERALD, III, Trustee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:18-cv-00789-LMB-MSN) Submitted: June 13, 2019 Decided: June 17, 2019 Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1173 FURQAN MOHAMMAD, Debtor - Appellant, v. U.S. BANK, N.A., Creditor - Appellee, and JOHN P. FITZGERALD, III, Trustee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:18-cv-00789-LMB-MSN) Submitted: June 13, 2019 Decided: June 17, 2019 Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished p..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1173 FURQAN MOHAMMAD, Debtor - Appellant, v. U.S. BANK, N.A., Creditor - Appellee, and JOHN P. FITZGERALD, III, Trustee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:18-cv-00789-LMB-MSN) Submitted: June 13, 2019 Decided: June 17, 2019 Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Furqan Mohammad, Appellant Pro Se. Jessica Ashley Glajch, Edward John Longosz, II, ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Furqan Mohammad appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order granting relief from the automatic stay. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mohammad v. U.S. Bank, N.A., No. 1:18-cv-00789-LMB-MSN (E.D. Va. Jan. 28, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
