Filed: Sep. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1187 In re: LEETRELL T. MYLES, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:05-cv-00192-TSE-TCB) Submitted: August 22, 2019 Decided: September 17, 2019 Before WILKINSON and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Leetrell T. Myles, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Leetrell T. Myles p
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1187 In re: LEETRELL T. MYLES, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:05-cv-00192-TSE-TCB) Submitted: August 22, 2019 Decided: September 17, 2019 Before WILKINSON and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Leetrell T. Myles, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Leetrell T. Myles pe..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1187
In re: LEETRELL T. MYLES,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:05-cv-00192-TSE-TCB)
Submitted: August 22, 2019 Decided: September 17, 2019
Before WILKINSON and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Leetrell T. Myles, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Leetrell T. Myles petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order compelling
the Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections to provide legal documents related
to his 2001 state convictions. We deny the petition.
Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary
circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court,
426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v.
Moussaoui,
333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Mandamus relief is available only
when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re Murphy-Brown, LLC,
907
F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018). This court does not have jurisdiction to grant mandamus
relief against state officials. Gurley v. Super. Ct. of Mecklenburg Cty.,
411 F.2d 586, 587
(4th Cir. 1969) (per curiam).
Myles seeks an order directing action by a state official, but we do not have
jurisdiction to grant relief against state officials. Accordingly, we deny the petition for
writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2