Filed: Aug. 14, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1388 FATOUMA KITETE, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: July 17, 2019 Decided: August 14, 2019 Before KEENAN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Fatouma Kitete, Petitioner Pro Se. Carmel A. Morgan, Tim Ramnitz, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEP
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1388 FATOUMA KITETE, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: July 17, 2019 Decided: August 14, 2019 Before KEENAN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Fatouma Kitete, Petitioner Pro Se. Carmel A. Morgan, Tim Ramnitz, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPA..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1388
FATOUMA KITETE,
Petitioner,
v.
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: July 17, 2019 Decided: August 14, 2019
Before KEENAN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Fatouma Kitete, Petitioner Pro Se. Carmel A. Morgan, Tim Ramnitz, Office of
Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,
D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Fatouma Kitete, a native of Egypt and a citizen of Zaire (now the Democratic
Republic of the Congo), petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings sua sponte. We lack
jurisdiction to review how the agency exercises its sua sponte discretion. See Lawrence v.
Lynch,
826 F.3d 198, 206 (4th Cir. 2016); Mosere v. Mukasey,
552 F.3d 397, 400-01 (4th
Cir. 2009). Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DISMISSED
2