Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

William Grant, II v. Joint Chiefs of Staff, 19-1422 (2019)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 19-1422 Visitors: 2
Filed: Aug. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1422 WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge. (1:19-cv-00013-JPJ-PMS) Submitted: August 20, 2019 Decided: August 22, 2019 Before FLOYD and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Will
More
                                    UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT


                                      No. 19-1422


WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II,

                    Plaintiff - Appellant,

             v.

JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF,

                    Defendant - Appellee.



Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge. (1:19-cv-00013-JPJ-PMS)


Submitted: August 20, 2019                                        Decided: August 22, 2019


Before FLOYD and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.


Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


William Lee Grant, II, Appellant Pro Se.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

       William Lee Grant, II, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the

record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the

reasons stated by the district court. Grant v. Joint Chiefs of Staff, No. 1:19-cv-00013-JPJ-

PMS (W.D. Va. Apr. 3, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                               DISMISSED




                                             2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer