In re: Anthony Trappier, 19-1454 (2019)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: 19-1454
Visitors: 28
Filed: Sep. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1454 In re: ANTHONY GENE TRAPPIER, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (4:09-cr-00340-TLW-1) Submitted: September 6, 2019 Decided: September 17, 2019 Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Gene Trappier, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Anthony Gene Trappier has petitioned this co
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1454 In re: ANTHONY GENE TRAPPIER, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (4:09-cr-00340-TLW-1) Submitted: September 6, 2019 Decided: September 17, 2019 Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Gene Trappier, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Anthony Gene Trappier has petitioned this cou..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1454 In re: ANTHONY GENE TRAPPIER, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (4:09-cr-00340-TLW-1) Submitted: September 6, 2019 Decided: September 17, 2019 Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Gene Trappier, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Anthony Gene Trappier has petitioned this court for a writ of mandamus. In his petition, Trappier asks this court to order the district court to rule on his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(d)(3) motion. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court recently disposed of Trappier’s motion. Because the district court has decided Trappier’s motion, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2
Source: CourtListener
