Filed: Jul. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1500 CALVIN EARL BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF WAKE COUNTY, Court Administration; R. ALLEN BADDOUR, Presiding Judge; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (4:18-cv-00199-FL) Submitted: July 16, 2019 Decided: July 18, 2019 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circ
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1500 CALVIN EARL BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF WAKE COUNTY, Court Administration; R. ALLEN BADDOUR, Presiding Judge; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (4:18-cv-00199-FL) Submitted: July 16, 2019 Decided: July 18, 2019 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circu..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1500
CALVIN EARL BROWN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SUPERIOR COURT OF WAKE COUNTY, Court Administration; R. ALLEN
BADDOUR, Presiding Judge; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Greenville. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (4:18-cv-00199-FL)
Submitted: July 16, 2019 Decided: July 18, 2019
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Calvin Earl Brown, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Calvin Earl Brown appeals the district court’s order denying his fourth Fed. R.
Civ. P. 60(b) motion to reconsider the court’s prior order accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Superior
Court of Wake Cty. No. 4:18-cv-00199-FL (E.D.N.C. Apr. 25, 2019) We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2