Filed: Aug. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1520 TIMOTHY OMAR HANKINS, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; MARY JEAN GURGANUS; CHAD AXFORD; JENNIFER SMITH ECHOLS; KATHLEEN MURPHY; JOHN M. OLIVER; SARDIA MARIE HANKINS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (7:18-cv-00037-D) Submitted: August 22, 2019 Decided: August 26,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1520 TIMOTHY OMAR HANKINS, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; MARY JEAN GURGANUS; CHAD AXFORD; JENNIFER SMITH ECHOLS; KATHLEEN MURPHY; JOHN M. OLIVER; SARDIA MARIE HANKINS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (7:18-cv-00037-D) Submitted: August 22, 2019 Decided: August 26, 2..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1520
TIMOTHY OMAR HANKINS, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; MARY JEAN GURGANUS; CHAD
AXFORD; JENNIFER SMITH ECHOLS; KATHLEEN MURPHY; JOHN M.
OLIVER; SARDIA MARIE HANKINS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Wilmington. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (7:18-cv-00037-D)
Submitted: August 22, 2019 Decided: August 26, 2019
Before KING and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy Omar Hankins, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Timothy Omar Hankins, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion
to reopen his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action and denying his request for mandamus
relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Hankins v. North Carolina, No. 7:18-cv-
00037-D (E.D.N.C. May 8, 2019). We deny Hankins’ motion to recuse any judge who
has been admitted to the North Carolina bar. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2