Filed: Aug. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1549 In re: ZANTWAN DEVORRIS WORTHY, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:07-cr-00127-NCT-1) Submitted: August 20, 2019 Decided: August 22, 2019 Before FLOYD and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Zantwan Devorris Worthy, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Zantwan Devorris Worthy
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1549 In re: ZANTWAN DEVORRIS WORTHY, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:07-cr-00127-NCT-1) Submitted: August 20, 2019 Decided: August 22, 2019 Before FLOYD and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Zantwan Devorris Worthy, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Zantwan Devorris Worthy ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1549
In re: ZANTWAN DEVORRIS WORTHY,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:07-cr-00127-NCT-1)
Submitted: August 20, 2019 Decided: August 22, 2019
Before FLOYD and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Zantwan Devorris Worthy, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Zantwan Devorris Worthy petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the
district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his motion for reconsideration of the district
court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying Worthy’s 28
U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. Worthy seeks an order from this court directing the district
court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court ruled
on Worthy’s motion on July 29, 2019. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed
in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2