Filed: Nov. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1797 JAMAAL GITTENS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TRANSFORCE, INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:18-cv-01249-AJT-IDD) Submitted: November 21, 2019 Decided: November 25, 2019 Before KEENAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jamaal G
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1797 JAMAAL GITTENS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TRANSFORCE, INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:18-cv-01249-AJT-IDD) Submitted: November 21, 2019 Decided: November 25, 2019 Before KEENAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jamaal Gi..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1797
JAMAAL GITTENS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TRANSFORCE, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:18-cv-01249-AJT-IDD)
Submitted: November 21, 2019 Decided: November 25, 2019
Before KEENAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jamaal Gittens, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Erwin Schuler, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Reston,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jamaal Gittens appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to amend and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Gittens v. TransForce, Inc., No. 1:18-cv-01249-AJT-IDD (E.D. Va. July 16, 2019).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2