Filed: Jun. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6206 JACQUES PAUL VILLAFANA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HENRY THOMAS PADRICK, JR., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Roderick Charles Young, Magistrate Judge. (3:18-cv-00890-REP-RCY) Submitted: June 20, 2019 Decided: June 25, 2019 Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jacques Paul
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6206 JACQUES PAUL VILLAFANA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HENRY THOMAS PADRICK, JR., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Roderick Charles Young, Magistrate Judge. (3:18-cv-00890-REP-RCY) Submitted: June 20, 2019 Decided: June 25, 2019 Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jacques Paul V..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6206
JACQUES PAUL VILLAFANA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HENRY THOMAS PADRICK, JR.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Roderick Charles Young, Magistrate Judge. (3:18-cv-00890-REP-RCY)
Submitted: June 20, 2019 Decided: June 25, 2019
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jacques Paul Villafana, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jacques Paul Villafana seeks to appeal the district court’s order docketing his
complaint on the condition that Villafana either prepay the filing fee or comply with
procedures to proceed in forma pauperis. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over
final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337
U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Villafana seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor
an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in
forma pauperis, deny Villafana’s motion to stay, and dismiss the appeal for lack of
jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2