Filed: Jun. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6250 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KENNETH ORLANDO LEGRAND, a/k/a Kenneth Orlando Scott, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:90-cr-00302-NCT-1) Submitted: June 20, 2019 Decided: June 25, 2019 Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpubli
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6250 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KENNETH ORLANDO LEGRAND, a/k/a Kenneth Orlando Scott, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:90-cr-00302-NCT-1) Submitted: June 20, 2019 Decided: June 25, 2019 Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublis..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6250
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KENNETH ORLANDO LEGRAND, a/k/a Kenneth Orlando Scott,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:90-cr-00302-NCT-1)
Submitted: June 20, 2019 Decided: June 25, 2019
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth Orlando Legrand, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth Orlando Legrand appeals the district court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the
Sentencing Guidelines. On appeal, Legrand disputes the court’s decision not to grant an
even greater reduction. However, we have reviewed the record and discern no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Legrand, No. 2:90-cr-00302-NCT-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 14, 2019). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2