Filed: May 21, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6271 PERRY DUNNING, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MS. STONE, Case Manager; MS. BRUNNAYA, Unit Manager; MR. MYERS, Assistant Warden; LIEUTENANT PRICE, Constable, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:17-cv-01063-LMB-TCB) Submitted: May 16, 2019 Decided: May 21, 2019 Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, a
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6271 PERRY DUNNING, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MS. STONE, Case Manager; MS. BRUNNAYA, Unit Manager; MR. MYERS, Assistant Warden; LIEUTENANT PRICE, Constable, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:17-cv-01063-LMB-TCB) Submitted: May 16, 2019 Decided: May 21, 2019 Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, an..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6271
PERRY DUNNING,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MS. STONE, Case Manager; MS. BRUNNAYA, Unit Manager; MR. MYERS,
Assistant Warden; LIEUTENANT PRICE, Constable,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:17-cv-01063-LMB-TCB)
Submitted: May 16, 2019 Decided: May 21, 2019
Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Perry Dunning, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Perry Dunning appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2012) complaint with prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we modify the
dismissal to be without prejudice, we affirm as modified for the reasons stated by the
district court. Dunning v. Stone, No. 1:17-cv-01063-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. Feb. 8, 2019).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
2