Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. James Gross, Sr., 19-6321 (2019)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 19-6321 Visitors: 31
Filed: Jul. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6321 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JAMES ELMER GROSS, SR., a/k/a Stink, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:02-cr-00201-CCB-1) Submitted: July 18, 2019 Decided: July 22, 2019 Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Elmer Gross,
More
                                    UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT


                                      No. 19-6321


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                    Plaintiff - Appellee,

             v.

JAMES ELMER GROSS, SR., a/k/a Stink,

                    Defendant - Appellant.



Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:02-cr-00201-CCB-1)


Submitted: July 18, 2019                                          Decided: July 22, 2019


Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


James Elmer Gross, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

      James Elmer Gross, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his

motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United States v. Muldrow, 
844 F.3d 434
, 437 (4th Cir. 2016) (providing standard). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                             AFFIRMED




                                            2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer