Filed: Jul. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6406 JAMES SIMPSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA; JUDGE DONALD W. LEMONS, Supreme Court of Virginia, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:18-cv-00547-JAG-RCY) Submitted: July 16, 2019 Decided: July 19, 2019 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6406 JAMES SIMPSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA; JUDGE DONALD W. LEMONS, Supreme Court of Virginia, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:18-cv-00547-JAG-RCY) Submitted: July 16, 2019 Decided: July 19, 2019 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per c..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6406
JAMES SIMPSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA; JUDGE DONALD W. LEMONS, Supreme
Court of Virginia,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:18-cv-00547-JAG-RCY)
Submitted: July 16, 2019 Decided: July 19, 2019
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Simpson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James Simpson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his pleading titled
“Criminal Complaint” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the
record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the
reasons stated by the district court. Simpson v. Supreme Court of Va., No.
3:18-cv-00547-JAG-RCY (E.D. Va. Mar. 18, 2019). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2