Filed: Jun. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6541 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ERIC ARTHUR WALTON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:94-cr-00021-FPS-JPM-1; 5:96-cr-00041-FPS-1) Submitted: June 20, 2019 Decided: June 25, 2019 Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6541 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ERIC ARTHUR WALTON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:94-cr-00021-FPS-JPM-1; 5:96-cr-00041-FPS-1) Submitted: June 20, 2019 Decided: June 25, 2019 Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per c..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6541
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ERIC ARTHUR WALTON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia,
at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:94-cr-00021-FPS-JPM-1;
5:96-cr-00041-FPS-1)
Submitted: June 20, 2019 Decided: June 25, 2019
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eric Arthur Walton, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Eric Arthur Walton appeals the district court’s order denying his “Request for
relief as to imposition of supervised release pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651 for an argument
of ‘first blush.’” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Walton, Nos. 5:94-
cr-00021-FPS-JPM-1, 5:96-cr-00041-FPS-1 (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 11, 2019). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2