Filed: Aug. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6707 ALTON GREGORY SIMMONS-BEY, a/k/a Gregory Simmons-Bey, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. J. L. GODWIN, Magistrate; J. D. RATTELADE, Raleigh Police Department; M. S. KOZAZCKI, II, Raleigh Police Department; AMY BREIGHTON, Magistrate; NANCY MCFARLAND, Mayor of Raleigh, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6707 ALTON GREGORY SIMMONS-BEY, a/k/a Gregory Simmons-Bey, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. J. L. GODWIN, Magistrate; J. D. RATTELADE, Raleigh Police Department; M. S. KOZAZCKI, II, Raleigh Police Department; AMY BREIGHTON, Magistrate; NANCY MCFARLAND, Mayor of Raleigh, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6707
ALTON GREGORY SIMMONS-BEY, a/k/a Gregory Simmons-Bey,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
J. L. GODWIN, Magistrate; J. D. RATTELADE, Raleigh Police Department; M. S.
KOZAZCKI, II, Raleigh Police Department; AMY BREIGHTON, Magistrate;
NANCY MCFARLAND, Mayor of Raleigh,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:19-ct-03080-FL)
Submitted: August 20, 2019 Decided: August 23, 2019
Before FLOYD and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alton Simmons, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Alton Simmons appeals the district court’s order dismissing Simmons’ 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Simmons v. Godwin, No. 5:19-ct-03080-FL (E.D.N.C. May 2, 2019). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2