Filed: Nov. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-7120 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. LARRY ANTONIO SIMMONS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (2:10-cr-00653-BHH-1) Submitted: November 21, 2019 Decided: November 26, 2019 Before KEENAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-7120 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. LARRY ANTONIO SIMMONS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (2:10-cr-00653-BHH-1) Submitted: November 21, 2019 Decided: November 26, 2019 Before KEENAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion...
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-7120 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. LARRY ANTONIO SIMMONS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (2:10-cr-00653-BHH-1) Submitted: November 21, 2019 Decided: November 26, 2019 Before KEENAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry Antonio Simmons, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Larry Antonio Simmons appeals the district court’s text order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under section 404 of the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115- 391, 132 Stat. 5194. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Simmons, No. 2:10-cr-00653-BHH-1 (D.S.C. July 19, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
